i was only following orders i was only following orders

The truth is about to finally hit the fan and this corrupt nazi Tory government will never be able to come back from their sickening disgusting acts that they are performing on the most invulnerable British people who are being deliberately targeted and treated like criminals and like we are pond life when we should be treated with care and compassion, a disabled person who is ruled as to be to sick to work needs help and care and compassion, we do not deserve to be victimized and treated like criminals, its not our choice to be disabled, its not something that we planned on for a career, sick and disabled people should never be treated the way that we are now, it is clear to me that this government and especially IDS mass murderer of the disabled thinks it is ok to continue his sick work of culling off and persecuting the sick and disabled in Britain, it is high time that IDS, the corrupt DWP and this government were all charged and prosecuted for the sick and twisted crimes that have been deliberately targeted at the sick and the disabled. Of the twelve of us present that day, only I remain, and my own end is rapidly approaching. You figure you are probably bound for battlefields of France or Russia or perhaps the Battle of Britain. But these men with guns and authority tell you to do so, and if you oppose orders of an officer, you risk death even yourself! There is a strong argument against the officers of the Wehrmacht and Waffen-SS at the post-World War II Nuremburg Trials in which those who issued orders that led to the killing of about 12 million civilians. Evil never sleeps. (LogOut/ So be warned of this possible future of Britain because of a greedy government who want to cut benefits that they have already decided on, the future does not look good for our country, all it takes is for 1 of these immigrants coming into our country with a serious disease as none of them who enter Britain have been checked at all and they could be carrying anything. This excuse was used by the Nazi war criminals at the post World War II Nuremberg Trials. Parade rest. | Apr 10, 2019 | Employment Law. In a second experiment, the team explored whether the loss of agency could also be seen in the brain activity of subjects. In a 1962 letter, as a last-ditch effort for clemency, Holocaust organizer Adolf Eichmann wrote that he and other low-level officers were forced to serve as mere instruments, shifting the responsibility for the deaths of millions of Jews to his superiors. Please check your inbox to confirm. I've used the example of the defense used at the Nuremberg war tribunal after World War II because this defense is mostly known through those trials and their defendants. Subscribe to Here's the Deal, our politics newsletter. "I was only following orders," has been unsuccessfully used as a legal defense in hundreds of cases (probably most notably by Nazi leaders at the Nuremberg tribunals following World War II). Your conscience tells you that the Nazi party's discrimination of various groups is wrong, but you are going to be in the Werhmacht, far away from the atrocities of the death camps. The decisions during these cases reaffirmed that following manifestly illegal orders is not a viable defense from criminal prosecution. Now you are an unwilling guard at a concentration camp who could risk punishment if you fail to "execute" your duties in shooting an escaping prisoner. Haggards team found that brain activity in response to this tone is indeed dampened when being coerced. His legal practice includes counseling businesses and individuals on a variety of legal issues and advocating on their behalf. To obey orders without thinking. Reblogged this on perfectlyfadeddelusions. Cookie Notice In other words, you have to pass yourself off as having been ignorant of the law, but even that defense is not tolerated in especially gross cases. The oligarchs must then impose authoritarian and increasingly brutal measures to maintain control. Most nations signatory to the United Nations Charter also enshrine the Nuremburg Principle in their respective national law. Generally, employees are liable for their own wrongful acts irrespective of whether or not they were doing so at the bequest of their boss. Doctors forbidden to prescribe ivermectin. While it would be a difficult situation that the employee is placed in, she should speak with employment counsel to stay on the right side of the law while protecting her interest. . I enjoyed barking orders more than I enjoyed following them. The phrase can refer to any attempt to deflect personal responsibility for a crime onto institutions like an army or the state. Jacob's son just entered first grade and Jacob plans to join the rest of the crowd by helping himself to some good supplies. Medication may be game-changer, wait for it. If you are the person who placed the order, you should have received a confirmation email shortly after completing your transaction. The legal precedent set by the Nuremberg Principle IV states: "The fact that a person acted pursuant to order of his Government or of a superior does not relieve him from responsibility under international law, provided a moral choice was in fact possible to him." My sister ordered the day before just to be sure they didn't sell out . If a low ranking soldier or officer is told that the building is full of insurgents and is ordered to attack it, and later it turns out it's a school, and there are 30 dead kids before the mistake is realized, is following orders a valid defense? Possibly the most famous ever study in social psychology was published 50 years ago by Stanley Milgram (1933 - 1984) in which he claimed to demonstrate that ordinary people would perform extraordinary acts of torture in blind obedience to . Military discipline and effectiveness are built on a foundation of obedience to orders. Article 92 conveys what constitutes the crime of disobedience of any lawful order (the disobedience does not have to be "willful" under this article). Women's Violence Prevention Act (South Korea), https://www.icc-cpi.int/nr/rdonlyres/ea9aeff7-5752-4f84-be94-0a655eb30e16/0/rome_statute_english.pdf, https://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Nuremberg_defense&oldid=2385274, Pages using DynamicPageList parser function. The Nuremberg Defense refers to a legal strategy employed by many of the defendants at the Nuremberg war crimes trials seeking to convict Nazi perpetrators of war crimes and crimes against humanity committed during the Second World War. Article 90 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) outlines the crime of willful disobedience by a military member a superior commissioned officer. There were generals who did their best to counteract orders from above that were against principles of humanity; General der Flieger Alexander Andrae comes to mind. If someone asks you if you're a god, you say, "Yes! Your conscience tells you that you shouldn't be working these facilities for the Third Reich - it's immoral! He said that he hated this Job Centre. edit just for clarity think a situation like being a conscript for the Nazi's. Adolf Eichmann was one of the most prominent Nazis to use this defense at his trial (held in Israel in 1961). As a result, if an employees manager or the business owner requests an employee to commit a criminal act, the employee should not do so and thereafter should speak privately with employment counsel to determine the best strategy as to that situation. Unlike Milgrams classic research, Haggards team introduced a shocking element that was missing in the original 1960s experiments: actual shocks. For example, if an Army officer tells a sergeant to prepare his soldiers to clean the barracks for an upcoming inspection, there is the belief the order will be followed. Squad halt. One would have to establish that not following said orders would result in immediate serious bodily injury or death (or a reasonable fear of such) and that there was no reasonable way to avoid following the orders or alternative course of action available. I led my squad in manual of arms and close-order drill, which taught us three things:1. During the War with France, Congress passed a law making it permissible to seize ships bound for any French Port. Reblogged this on Brightonredhots Weblog and commented: Right shoulder arms. Right face. Doctors are independent professionals. The military court rejected Calley's argument of obeying the order of his superiors. "I was only following orders," has been unsuccessfully used as a legal defense in hundreds of cases (probably most notably by Nazi leaders at the Nuremberg tribunals following World War II). The Nuremberg Trials of German war criminals after World war II determined that this is no defense, and that some orders are illegal and must not be followed. This incident probably rates as the worst in US post-War military history. Nazis accused of war crimes said it at Nuremberg "I was only following orders." Soldiers like Lt. William Calley accused of atrocities at My Lai in Vietnam tried it, too. I went through four years of ROTC in high school and college. Not everyone disregards history. Stalin died in 1953 at his dacha of a stroke at age 74, and Mao died in 1976 at the age of 80 from Parkinsons Disease. Article 33 of the Rome Statute,[2] which established the International Criminal Court, allows the Nuremberg defense to relieve an individual of criminal responsibility provided: This principle, one of many drawn up in the run up to the Nuremberg trials, states: Nuremberg Principle IV was disputed in Canada when Jeremy Hinzman attempted to claim refugee status there after deserting the US army. i held it for a few thousand feet and didnt spin too much. The order was not manifestly unlawful. The maltreatment of prisoners is a crime under both international lawand the Uniform Code of Military Justice (seeArticle 93 Cruelty and Maltreatment). https://www.pbs.org/newshour/science/how-the-nazis-defense-of-just-following-orders-plays-out-in-the-mind, criticize the famous electric-shock study. On September 2nd, 2019, Redditor[3] TheFebrezeWizard posted a Lego Yoda meme in which they edited Lego Yoda into the black and white photograph of Hermann Gring during the Nuremberg trials (shown below; original post no longer available). Pretty simple reasoning, if this person is in the military and ordered to do something the punishment for disobeying orders is/was often death. In 1957, the Israeli legal system established the concept of a 'blatantly illegal order' to explain when a military (or security-related) order should be followed, and when it must not be followed. [7] Reddit I was just following orders for gods sake! With profound regret, we must admit that "I was only following orders" works just as well in America as it did in Nazi Germany. As our government continues down this slippery slope, it is very likely that law enforcement personnel and American citizens will find themselves caught on opposing sides of a constitutional and moral dilemma. This isn't a dress rehearsal for totalitarianism, it is totalitarianism. For example, on February 8th, 2019, YouTube[2] user Etheral Snake posted a humorous video titled "Thomas was only following orders" in which Thomas the Tank Engine, a defendant during the Nuremberg trials, recollects serving as a train delivering Jews to the Nazi concentration camps during the World War II. You are to be supervising the inmates' work on aircraft. The purpose of Think Left is to present a view of politics from a left-wing perspective. UCMJ has not been invoked often since its implementation. An order to perform a military duty, no matter how dangerous, is lawful as long as it doesn't involve the commission of a crime. For example, a September 3rd, 2019, repost[4] of the meme by Redditor ElJeanMermoude received over 18,000 upvotes in /r/fakehistoryporn subreddit. Its difficult to ascertain whether participants are really deceived or not in such situations., https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yU-rlInny6Q, Video by YouTube user Charles Ewing Smith. Vaccine protection durable. I would say that the person who signed the order should be the one punished. In the Uniform Code of Military Justice, there is discussion concerning lawful versus unlawful orders, a critical distinction that is difficult or even impossible to define. As a junior, she plans to graduate early at the end of this year, with goals to go to Lincoln University next year and . Be very afraid. Forward march. You remember the one who lied about everything and spent all his time blaming immigrants for running the country. In this test, the agent is not under the watchful gaze of an authority figure. In this test, the agent can shock or take money from the victim, either acting on orders or by their own choice. I rose to the rank of corporal but was a squad leader. The United States Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) 809.ART.90 (20) Law enforcement personnel become the face of cruelty and tyranny as they are required to enforce edicts both they and the people know are illegal and immoral. (LogOut/ While it is possible that a prosecutor in discussing a possible plea bargain may consider whether or not she was following orders and not personally benefiting from the criminal act that she committed, if she commits a crime on behalf of her employer, both she and that employer may be found guilty for the criminal offenses. Millions have been slaughtered to satisfy the greed and lust for power of the few, and too often there is neither punishment for the guilty nor justice for the dead. I led my squad in manual of arms and close-order drill, which taught us three things: Covid not spread person-to-person. Large gatherings forbidden. Log in or register to write something here or to contact authors. These articles require the obedience of LAWFUL orders. Vaccine protective, return to normal. Hinzman and his supporters argued that because the war in Iraq may be in breach of international law, it could possibly end with him and other troops being tried for war crimes. You can also check the status of your orders and shipments by logging into Dashboard. Recruits are taught to obey orders from their superiors immediately and without question, right from day one of boot camp. This tone elicited a brain response that could be measured by an electroencephalogram (EEG) cap. A September 4th, 2019, repost[5] by Redditor wasp12313 in /r/HistoryMemes received over 2,700 upvotes. On March 29, 1971, Calley was convicted of premeditated murder and . The public policy exception to the employee-at-will doctrine prohibits from an employer in bad terminating an employee because she refused to do something public policy would discourage or did something public policy would encourage. The three Services are bound by different acts, including the Air Force (Constitution) Act 1919, the Air Force Act 1955, the Naval Discipline Act 1955, the Army Act 1955, the Military Code 1883 and the Armed Forces Act 1993. Delivery & Pickup Options - 3 reviews of Korea Taqueria "Been following one of the owners since his food truck days and I always loved the Korean fusion from Paper Mill Foods spurrito truck so it's great to see a brick and mortar with another fun fusion! Doctors are independent professionals. Researchers measured a small, but significant increase in the perceived time between a persons action and outcome when coercion was involved. But, our study does suggest that this claim might potentially correspond to the basic experience that the person had of their action at the time, Haggard said. But does the military member have a duty to DISOBEY unlawful orders including orders of senior officers, Secretary of Defense and even the President of the United States? Your email address will not be published. You think you will not face any dilemma with Jews or gypsies or whomever. The military court rejected Calley's argument of obeying the order of his superiors. I was only following orders, a defense that fails in earthly courts, will most assuredly also fail in the highest court of all. Ethical problems arise when the mechanisms of government are perverted to grant excessive authority and privilege to the ruling class, who then enrich themselves at the expense of everyone else. Military courts have long held that military members are accountable for their actions even while following orders. The UCMJ actually protects the soldier in this situation as he/she has a moral and legal obligation to the Constitution and not to obey unlawful orders and the people who issue them. Milgrams studies rested on a deception: Participants were instructed to administer severe shocks to an actor, who in fact merely feigned being shocked, Haggard said. Social Media for Small Business in Surrey & SW London. document.getElementById( "ak_js_1" ).setAttribute( "value", ( new Date() ).getTime() ); Joe Halewood writes about tenant and welfare wrongs, short stories, comment, articles, humour and photography, "The economy doesn't work like most people think it works! For a start, people who give orders should perhaps be held more responsible for the actions and outcomes of those they coerce, he said. The biggest argument I can see against this is who should get the blame then? ", How this radical idea can make growth optional, Experiences and Thoughts of an Angry Carer. The legal precedent set by the Nuremberg Principle IV states: Despite the Nuremburg Trials being primarily a dissection of the most horrific phase in recent history, and a trial for those held responsible, they became a massive influence military law throughout much of the developed world following the War, and as long as the Nuremburg Principle is upheld it is hoped that aberrations like the My Lai Massacre remain little more than that - aberrations, isolated yet terrible events. Theyre free to shock or take money from the victim, if they want. Thank you. Please. Dan. It is very easy to cast those such as Heinrich Himmler and Josef Mengele as war criminals that deserve to be hung, but can you say the same for those that truly were just following orders and those who had no say in the matter? This non-excuse became infamous during the Nuremberg Trials after World War II. Learn more about Friends of the NewsHour. Image courtesy of Caspar et al., Current Biology (2016). Vaccine protective, return to normal. In other words, US military personnel are not required to follow orders that contravene the Laws and Constitution of the United States. Vicious dictators like Stalin and Mao, together responsible for killing over 100 million people, died of natural causes. The defence of I was obeying orders is not valid if those orders command an illegal act - like murder. . For employers, management should be provided ethical training specific to your business with a clearly expressed expectation of honesty. Perry said Milgrams experiments were far less controlled than originally thought and introduced variables that appeared to goose the numbers. By accepting all cookies, you agree to our use of cookies to deliver and maintain our services and site, improve the quality of Reddit, personalize Reddit content and advertising, and measure the effectiveness of advertising. Imagine numerous scenarios in which law enforcement personnel are ordered to enforce laws that both they and you know are unconstitutional and morally wrong. Period. Sen. Daniel Inouye of Hawaii told Lt Col Oliver North, the man who carried much of the responsibility for the Affair, that he was breaking his US Oath of Allegiance when he "blindly" followed the orders of President Ronald Reagan. The military oath taken at the time of induction into the military is as follows: "I,____________, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to the regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. This [disconnect] suggests a reduced sense of agency, as if the participants actions under coercion began to feel more passive, Haggard said. We are only following orders.. Probably the most famous case of the "I was only following orders" defense was the court-martial of First Lieutenant William Calley for his part in the My Lai Massacre on March 16, 1968. If these new benefit cuts come in, there is only 1 thing that will happen and that is the end of the world, simple reason is people will be made homeless because they cant afford to live in their homes so then they will be homeless, they reckon this figure will be as much as 500,000 British people and families, crime will then sky rocket and if 500,000 plus are made homeless where are they supposed to live, this will then cause major health problems and with the NHS as it is it wont be able to handle this, imagine now if just 1 person living on the streets from benefit cuts was to get seriously ill then it would spread like wildfire, imagine if this was an incurable disease then the Nhs could not then cope with this medical epidemic this would then turn into a pandemic and if this could not be cured this would either go world wide or Britain would then have to be destroyed and nuked from the earth in order to stop this from spreading. Under British Law, Servicemen are directed to "observe and obey all orders of Her Majesty," (see the node on the RAF Oath of Allegiance) as well as those of their senior officers. Providing Legal Services For More Than 125 Years, On Behalf of Hamblett & Kerrigan, P.A. They are legislating by executive decree, ignoring restrictions on constitutional authority, putting our national economy and personal financial futures at enormous risk, and imposing laws and penalties on citizens without due process.