leica m240 vs m262 image quality leica m240 vs m262 image quality

I took the M240 because it offeres live view. Intro Sample Images Lenses Specs Performance. I really have found it quite distracting to have an image preview thats different to what Im used to, especially since its both inaccurate and in a way thats unappealing to my tastes. By With regards to minimizing my digital camera gear, my thinking was simple. By Exphotog, A Love Affair With The Leica M-D 262 by Ong Sien Hong - 35mmc, Initial experiments with a Leica M10-P and a Nikon 35mm 2.8 PC Shift Lens - 35mmc, (Mis)adventures with a Minolta Himatic 7s - By Matt Evans, 5 Frames with the new Voigtlander Color-Skopar Vintage Line 21mm f/3.5 By John Scott, Camera, Lens, Film and Peripheral Kit Reviews. Equally, Ive not found the dynamic range to be too limited. . A device's overall image quality score considers: color depth, dynamic range and low light performance. The image on viewfinder of that camera is very warm yet when the images are loaded onto the computer they are less so. Of course Im now retired and not doing imaging for a living. When the Leica M262 was released, Leica proudly told the world that the menu had been reduced to two screens worth of features. The colour differences between the two are due to slightly different colour handling in the camera and can be cancelled out completely by the camera profiles in LR. I didnt have the energy to get into the subtleties of all that here though, LV is useful even if the screen does not move. You can get two M-Ps (old and new) for the same price as one M10. Epson RD1 style I loved my RD1! 3200-10,000 (I find this to be really handy for indoor family photos, which is essentially the only time I need high ISOs) the larger and brighter viewfinder the size (yes, one can really feel a difference) overall operational responsiveness to a much lesser degree: fewer buttons on the back of the camera, smaller red dot, more matte black finish. After the M11 released though, used prices of the M10 dropped and I decided to get one. For my abilities and needs, I have a decent collection of film cameras (too many some might say) and an M8 which is surprisingly still better than just good and more than good enough for what I tend to photograph.But I admit to seriously considering the new Q2, That Q2 has excited a lot of people, it seems!Re. without having to transfer the images to the computer first. The sensor is still not what I would consider great (or even competitive) in regards to dynamic range and high ISO quality, perhaps I was just spoiled by the incredible capabilities of the Nikon Df. As I mentioned in my recent post about the M240, the stripped-back interface was exactly reason . Sadly, that is the way of digital cameras my friend, a never-ending hamster wheel of upgrades. After a few weeks of using the new Leica M262 I posted a review along with a few videos. Continue with Recommended Cookies. The M10 has the new ISO wheel on the top left. Yes, it adds a Wi-Fi connectivity, which is something completely new in my workflow, but the overall experience is so much simpler. More humble pie for me! I find it very quick. I admit, Im a bit of a snob with stills cameras. . The M240 shot..more DR it seems. It leaves me with no desire whatsoever to upgrade at all and will be my sole digital camera for hopefully many years to come. I wont go into too much more detail now, but for saying that unlike the M240 and M262 that Ive otherwise used since the M9, the Leica M10-P really feels like it has []. Looking forward to your impressions, cheers! Usability is great (with some of the limitations you mentioned), and image quality of the 262 is certainly superb, and the main reason (aside from usability and a good sensor), at least for me, the Leica M glass, is a topic somebody else can cover much better than I can. Some of our partners may process your data as a part of their legitimate business interest without asking for consent. Ive turned off the automatic image review and hardly ever needto go through the menu - and for the few times that I do so I appreciate the very simple menu structure so its easy to find what Im after. With the M262 even going away for a long weekend I would debate the need to even take the charger for a single battery. Unsurprisingly, the camera never really made a breakthrough in the video world so perhaps Leica decided it wasn't worth keeping it. It is the first position on the menu, and setting WB on a grey card or to a preset is a matter of 3 or 4 clicks.Colors. (Leica M Typ 240), Nikon D850 + Nikon AF-S Nikkor 24-120mm f/4G ED VR, Canon EOS 5D Mark IV + Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM, Sony Alpha a7 III + Sony FE 24-105mm f/4 G OSS, Sony a6600 + Sony E 18-135mm F3__5-5__6 OSS, Sony Alpha a7 III + Sony FE 28-70mm f/3__5-5__6 OSS, Canon EOS 5D Mark IV + Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 USM. The build quality of the M 262 is impeccable. All images generated with the M262 + 24mm 3.8 were taken July 6 between 3 and 5 PM around Victoria, BC in direct overhead sunlight (far from ideal), https://www.dropbox.com/sh/borvrgwfsovpoiz/AADvQ-IsxTfl51btqaCD_i4Fa?dl=0. It usesa 24-megapixel CMOS sensor, a Maestro image processor witha near-silent shutter, and a quiet shutter-cocking motor. I currently shoot with a Fuji X-Pro2 and love it. Both are great cameras and either would be fine. Leica claims it uses different technology, whatever that means. Great article as always! That said, even in the short time Ive owned a Leica M240, its confused me with what seems like an obvious short coming, changed my mind about one feature that I had written of as pretty much useless to me, proved that another one of its highlight features is indeed something I have no interest in, and perhaps unfortunately (since I cant afford one) left me with big a chunk of Leica M10 GAS. More microphones result in better sound quality and enable the device to filter out background noise. Unfortunately, my business partner has also vetoed the idea of me selling both M240 and M262 to buy an M10. It is great way to capture things like the setting sun, or clouds moving across the sky. Source: DxOMark. For compact cameras, a focus motor is usually built-in. M262 is simple M240 less some features not necessary to still picture but in M240, those features can be ignored. Here is a quickreview and comparison for the Leica M Typ 262 vs M Typ 240 rangefinder cameras. For the M240, forget it. These were features I wanted to explore whilst I had this camera though I really had very low expectations that they would do much for me. The big round dial on the back of the M9 was always tricky to use. And if you find the viewfinder better, as many report. And thats pushing it. So, yeah, as I said, video is just not something I want to do with a Leica M camera! The SET and the ISO buttons are much more useful though to be honest, I personally dont even use the stuff in the set menu either. Even though this image set was only intentionally overexposed by a single stop in direct sunlight, the highlights from the image samples taken by the Leica M246 and the Leica M Monochrom were blown and unrecoverable in post processing. Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. Of course with these features comes a fairly significant increase in menu options too, though I must admit, I was surprised how simple the menu remains given the extra features on offer. . Having said that, I think the M262 could be a perfect digital rangefinder camera for those looking for a minimal film-camera like digital Leica experience and not needing live view or other features. After more than a month of use it is apparent the M 262 Image quality is better than that of the M-240 (which i have used since it became available). Im an auto-ISO guy so the dial is nice for the little I use it. Quality over quantity. I just dont shoot it at that high ISO for it to be a problem, and often wonder what on earth people are doing with their cameras to need the sorts of high ISOs that get spoken about it reviews. I am looking to get into the Leica M systemhave been on various of the Leica Fora, discussing the merits of an M9 / M9P. One has a brightline window, the other does not. Unfortunately, there are elements of the way the ISO modes work that have slightly bothered me.if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'35mmc_com-large-leaderboard-2','ezslot_13',184,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-large-leaderboard-2-0'); To be fair, the auto ISO is really well implemented. I shoot with 35mm and 50mm lenses. (Leica M (Typ 262)) CIPA is an independent, standard measurement that determines how many shots a camera can take before the battery dies. No. They've been even used in a documentary made by a friend of mine. The number of megapixels determines the resolution of the images captured with the main camera. I remember initially thinking that the colours coming out of the M10 files seemed thin when compared to those of the M240 and the photos in your review of the M262 have reminded me of that. That breaks the rules by my measure, unfortunately . We and our partners use cookies to Store and/or access information on a device. dslr . This is the reason I was so keen not to be without one for a few months so when the M240 didnt initially seem all that different to the M262 I was really pleased!if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'35mmc_com-medrectangle-4','ezslot_12',181,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-medrectangle-4-0'); This relief quickly turned to intrigue. Thats why the M-D 262 and the M 262 have the same type name. Im not trying to justify myself I certainly wouldnt to trolls the point is simply that I spend my money on something I enjoy. My budget is c. 3,000 for the camera and lens. They were taken about a minute apart as I only had one tripod and needed to put the . I could get myself in position where something was about to happen, use the rangefinder or live-view to pick a point of focus, then whilst looking at the back of the camera I could use my peripheral vision to judge the timing of whatever I was taking a photo of whilst maintaining focus confirmation.if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[250,250],'35mmc_com-large-leaderboard-2','ezslot_17',184,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-large-leaderboard-2-0'); I do this all the time with the Sony cameras, yet had never joined the dots and worked out that it might be something Id enjoy or find use for with a rangefinder. Best wishes to you all and thanks again for your help. Value for money, incredible quality. With a standard mini jack socket, you can use the device with most headphones. I love the files the camera produces, the size and weight is just right and operationally it couldnt be much simpler. Since receiving a closer focusing lens though Ive noticed that actually the M10 rangefinder goes down to about 0.58m and the M262 goes to about 0.65m. Last year I got the 262 and had been quite pleased with it. It was designed and released after the M240 to offer an option to photographers who didn't need the bells and whistles the M240 had to offer. The bigger the screen size is, the better the user experience. Yura, I still use both with other M along. By Thanks for the insights Louis! The view taken by some Leica users when the M240 was released was that features like live-view and video had no place on a Leica. A higher screen resolution provides a sharper image, making it easier to review your photos. I didn't do any critical tests, but I feel the M262 may have around one stop advantage at high iso. Fast continuous shooting is useful for catching action shots. It was designed and released after the M240 to offer an option to photographers who didnt need the bells and whistles the M240 had to offer. Fortunately, when the image popped up in Lightroom, it was fine or at least it was little different to a photo that I might have expected out of the M262. Ive tried all of the digital M types and my heartfelt favorites are the M8 and M9-P (equally), then the Typ 262 in that order. I am aware many own the Monochrom and love it to death. Upload or insert images from URL. The Leica M10-R rangefinder camera has a newly developed 40 megapixel sensor that represents a big increase from the 24 megapixels of the previous M10 model. Hi everyone. I wanted an M262 for all the reasons above but found an M-P 240 for a really good price and just turned off all the video and live view. My biggest issue in day-to-day use was the control over the ISO, which I find leaves me a little disconnected from what setting Im using. Its been that camera that I know is there and just crack out when it feels right. It's small, light, cheap and extremely wide but is it any good? With less than full coverage, you may have to crop your photos afterward to get them looking perfect. The camera is nearly forgotten in the Leica world. By comparison, the Leica M240 had a lot of features many of which, as Ive alluded to, were seen by some as not needed on a Leica M rangefinder. Of course there will be technological advances and all kinds of new features. I drive a 15 year old car for example, dont buy clothes often, have one pair of shoes, etc. Simple. I have a X113 and an M262. You can post now and register later. When using the M10 in aperture priority mode I dial the EV down to -0.7. In one of his editorial pieces in Amateur Photographer he applauds this philosophy. Really useful! Last thursday I thought for a few moments about selling my complete gear because of the new Q2, but then I thought about my beloved Summicron 90 from 1973 and my Tele Elmar 135 from 1963 and my Summilux 50 from 2017 and then I said to me: No!, I cannot sell them, I am not a fan of 28 mm.The only tiny shortcoming is for me the limitation of the maximum shutter speed (60 sec) and sometimes I miss an autofocus. Any chance youre planning to do a write up on that Nokton 50mm f/1.2? Since most reviews are quite large in content thanks to extensive coverage, comparisons to other cameras and large sample images, they span across multiple pages for easier reading experience. The entire camera feels built to last and like a well engineered tool in use. When moving from M9 to M262 Id not put too much thought into how much difference this would make to me, in practice though, this small change in interface makes a big difference to how the camera feels. All photographs and text appearing on 35mmc.com are the exclusive property of the named author (except where stated otherwise) and are protected by copyright. That said, I do miss the live view feature. I decided that I wanted to keep the one camera that can do close to everything I need in the digital world (and for me, this includes personal and occasional professional work, mostly product still photography, but also videography). No one ever uses video functionality of the240 anyways. The Leica M [typ 240] (or M240 for short) was the first Leica to adopt the odd naming convention that broke away from the M# convention of yore. Can you compare side by side, please? One video compares the sound of the shutter to the the M-E. Jump to content . If not, get the 262. I shot film forever and my M2 was my first range finder. Even when recording scenes with a lot of fast movements, the videos are sharp and clear. Both were taken at 3200 ISO to try and exaggerate any image quality issues. In my view the lens in use IS much more important than a bit colour differences M240/M262/other Ms. Selling the M262, a camera that I purchased for its pure simplicity; and keeping the Z6, a camera that I purchased for its many features (including live view, a hybrid camera with fantastic video capabilities including full frame 4K, compatibility with my Profoto strobes, owning quite a bit of Nikon F-mount glass, auto-focus, etc.)! People get all gnarled up about refresh rates and such, but the M240s EVF is fine for its limited uses.Focus Peaking. Im still getting used to it, but for me a 2 issues, weight with a big 50mm lens and editing the files you really bring out the image quality as it seems a bit flat to me. Cant quite stretch to the Summicron or Summilux at the moment All the best and, no doubt, I will be on here again soon with myriad questions! I could sell the M262, and my beloved Monochrom (and maybe a couple of lenses), thus satisfying the GAS problem and simultaneously slimming down my cameras without actually having to spend any more money or as my mate James would say, I could make this a revenue-neutral purchase. I typically use a 75mm lens on my M 262. Most of the digital M bodies are going to offer a satisfactory experience for the average first time Leica user. Content contributor - become a part of the worlds biggest film and alternative photography community blog. Cheers! It was mentioned in LFI first issue of 2016. Of all the mentioned digital rangefinders, I enjoyed the [], [] is a definite yes! I dont have and 6-bit coded lenses, or really bother with the coding, so just tend to set the minimum speed to 1/60th. The WB white balance button is completely redundant by my measure. Using the right SD card is key here. Press and hold, select ISO, and release to lock in the setting. On the M240 its easy to change ISO by simply pressing the dedicated ISO button and turning the thumb adjustment wheel.The EVF. Thorsten Overgaard recently posted two comparative X-Rite colorchecker images that show the colour differences between the 262 and 240 which sold me on the 262. As the cameras are meant to have identical sensors, do we think this is just new owner's biased impressions (nothing wrong with that btw) is could there be something in this? Water-resistant devices can resist the penetration of water, such as powerful water jets, but not being submerged into water.