pending editor decision mdpi how long

Its important to mention that every manuscript is unique. I submitted an article to microorganisms. Heres an overview of the statuses and their meanings. I revised the manuscript according to all comments and recommendations from the reviewers reports. MDPI waives around a quarter of its APCs every year and offers one of the most affordable pricing structures in the commercial publishing landscape. MDPI is a different publisher. Hi Navdeep, thanks for your comment. Hi, You could try submitting without style files. I would like to inquire about the status of my manuscript that has been under review since the 21st of November 2022 [Cells] Manuscript ID: cells-2079368. I hope we can receive a detailed peer review report. If you find yourself waiting for more than two days, please contact the Assistant Editor, who will investigate the status of your paper and invite an English editor to proofread it. This manuscript status means that the Academic Editor is assessing the peer review process. Some editors keep a paper for long time, more than 6 months or a year, without a decision and when send them a reminder message they do not reply or sometimes reply for the first time saying. Hi, This should give you all the answers youre looking for and put you at ease if you find yourself worried about your paper. Hi! But not publishing online yet. Thank you very much! Hi there Syed. No changes can be made at any point in the publishing process. Answer: When the status for a manuscript changes "Under Review" to "Ready for Decision", it means that the peer-review process is complete and only the editorial decision is pending. How can i do that, madam/sir. Any pending edits or misunderstandings will be addressed via email before the paper is published to avoid post-publication edits. As we know, Metals MDPI has a high reputation for the rapid publication process. If you submit without using an MDPI template, the Assistant Editor will help you with the layout during paper processing. They can provide you with an update on your manuscript and put your mind at ease. Because we maintain a very quick publishing service, we do not offer expedited peer review. This stage should take around two weeks, but may take longer depending on how easily we can find reviewers. You can find out more about our peer review process, pre-check and other policy requirements here: https://www.mdpi.com/editorial_process. In addition, I am a undergraduate student who are applying the master degree, so this article is of vital importance for me. From sharing the latest MDPI blog news, to showcasing our most popular articles, the newsletters will keep you in the loop with everything good going on in the science world. Under review = The paper is being peer-reviewed. So, based on your two rounds of revisions, the Associate Editor (AE) has made their decision on the manuscript and. thanks. if I understood properly my coauthor will get full discount right? Id like to ask about the status of Pending Editorial Decision which has lasted for more than 10 days. You are welcome to choose the same or another MDPI journal if the paper was rejected and you were encouraged to resubmit. We have submitted our manuscript and even its revised version to Scientia Pharmaceutica journal, and now the status has changed to Pending editor decision. You can get in touch with the journals Editorial Office about this request. In the near future, XML and HTML versions will also be made available. Various Dialect Groups on 2022-04-27, with manuscript ID: histories-1697518. Hello Waqas, many thanks for getting in touch! The Academic Editor needs to check a few things before the manuscript moves onto the next stage. We submitted the manuscript entitled Effectiveness of New Rock-Ramp Fishway at Miyanaka Intake Dam Compared with Existing Large and Small Stair-Type Fishways in water journal. The length of the process could be dependent on the editors workload, for example, or the scope of the journal/SI. They can give you the details. Here is a short video on manuscript status in Editorial Manager, and some additional articles on the manuscript submission process. In addition, all papers are available online as soon as they are published. I am the author of an article that wants to be published in Metals MDPI with the manuscript ID and title as follows: Manuscript ID: metals-1771094. Is it possible to change the document format after the first round of review? Pending major or minor revisions = Author revisions are in progress. Special Issue deadlines are by date only. I submitted my article on January 4, 2023, with the manuscript ID of polymers-2173405 on journal polymers . We encourage authors to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. could you provide me information that when that status will be updated? For updates related to your article, please contact the editorial office of the journal that you submitted to. The typo will be removed by MDPIs in-house English editors during the editorial process. It usually takes 12 days. Could you please reach out to the journals Editorial Office? I submitted the manuscipt on 30th May 2022 to Journal of Clinical Medicine, now more than 5 weeks passed but status in the system still under review. Thank you for your comment. Or is the academic editor hiring a fourth reviewer? Please could you reach out to the journals Editorial Office? MDPI uses iThenticate to review manuscripts for plagiarism. [1] 21 . I was asked to review for an MDPI journal and realized while requesting to extend the deadline for my review that the editor at MDPI intended to send review requests to several reviewers, to gather enough reviews to make a decision on the basis of the first 2-3 he received. Kindly shed some light. We also submitted a short text as per instructions given at :https://www.mdpi.com/authors/promoting. Ive reached out to the editorial office on your behalf, you should hear back from them soon. This stage refers to an internal process. . Our dedicated in-house team completes the administrative work. Please be sure to confirm this with the Assistant Editor as soon as one is assigned to your manuscript. Time is rather critical for this paper. Please get in touch with the editor assigned to your manuscript about this issue. But if go through the link the editorial decision is showing rejected and redeclined submission. We submitted the manuscript entitled, A Systematic Review of Deep Knowledge Graph-based Recommender Systems, with focus on Explainable Embeddings on 2022-03-22, with manuscript ID: data-1670544. Bank fees will be deducted from the refund. MDPI provides waivers and discounts to scholars around the world. I wonder if we can change the paper after being published online. We respectfully request the withdrawal of the dissertation. There is no limit to the length of papers! Your work will be read and rated by a few academics from your field. Our authors publications in English have enabled broad international readership, with more than 14 million MDPI webpage views monthly in 2020. You can find this feedback on SuSy, MDPIs manuscript submission system. But there is no update from the editor or journal. I Hope you are well. This reviewer wants to remain anonymous, so they selected (x) I would not like to sign my review report. Thanks for the comment, and thank you for being an MDPI author. Today, manuscript is again pending review. We find the automatic answer given to authors after rejected by editor considerably vague and in contradiction with the San Francisco Declaration, which MDPI signed on 2012 with this motto: We aim to publish all manuscripts that are scientifically correct, and do not artificially increase journal rejection rates, allowing the reader community at large to define impact. If this is correct, then what is rejection based on novelty and general significance after rejection by the editor? Most recent answer. The editor really supports our effort as authors. Hello, and have a nice day. Please contact them to resolve the issue. A summary of the editorial process is given in the flowchart below. After 2 rounds of the revision, 2 reviewers accept for the publication and 3rd one reject it, because he/she comments irrelevant to the manuscript and authors were not able able to satisfy him/her. Our online submission system, SuSy (https://susy.mdpi.com/), should automatically detect any vouchers associated with your account. Do I have to write the names of all authors, author affiliations, and funders in my manuscript? Our Editorial Office may agree to extended revision time, provided that the authors send their request to the in-house Assistant Editor. Unfortunately, they both have not yet answered. Our article is in the same status from the last 9 days. Thanks and regards. If you still dont notice any updates, please get back in touch. I have contacted the Data Editorial Office and I will keep you updated. now they asked me for another revision. You can find their details on the journal webpage, in the left-hand navigation bar. Is this status necessary after the pending conversion one ? The next status will be Revised version review, when reviewers will have their second look. I recommend contacting the Assistant Editor about this issue. As your paper is still being processed, you can easily withdraw and re-submit the paper. I went through the portal today and saw that the editors decision is to ask for additional review I am confused what does it mean. For example, how many hours should I add or subtract from GMT? Some may have other commitments, meaning that the reviews are submitted late. This may occur if, for example, one or more of the reviewers require(s) more time. Author proofreading resubmitted = Authors have resubmitted the latest version of their paper, and the Assistant Editor will accept changes and double-check that everything is correct before paper publication. The journals Editorial Office will be able to provide you with an update. after resubmission the one reviewer satisfy with my comments however other reviewer not satisfier with some comments. If you cannot return the edited manuscript and/or responses within the agreed time, you can get in touch with the Assistant Editor, who may be able to grant you an extension. Hi Nawal, thanks for the comment! You can find their details on SuSy. This will tell you all you need to know about this status. Another reason for addition was that, my supervisor don`t like rejection. What exact time are the submission forms closed on the deadline day? Please need guidance. This means you need to submit your manuscript before or on the date outlined on the Special Issue webpage. Then, I resubmitted the manuscript on 1st of October, it went to peer review, two positive responses one with minor revision and second accepted it. The papers got desk rejections and the same work is not accepted by IEEE Q1 journals. So here is our situation. Will the reviewer again make comments (which will take 3 more days) or it will directly go for editors decision? Can you please guide us cz its almost 15 days. If it is missed during the proof read? You can find their details on the journal webpage. Please reach out to the editor assigned to your paper about this issue.